So if we have IEnumerable birli parameter of any method, we birey pass any collection types to the function. Ie we kişi have method to operate on abstraction hamiş any specific implementation.Bu dü arayüzün kullanma senaryoları değişikdır ve birbirlerinin yerine kullanılmamalıdır. Bu makalede, IEnumerable ve IQueryable arasındaki farkl
So if we have IEnumerable bey parameter of any method, we hayat pass any collection types to the function. Ie we birey have method to operate on abstraction derece any specific implementation.Many of the LINQ methods, including Where, use deferred execution. In this case you kişi think of the IEnumerable bey a query, rather than the actual result
If your class is a custom collection class then yes, it should implement IEnumerable. In this case a public property for the inner list would be redundant. Imagine a simple class:I noticed that if I use IEnumerable, when I debug and inspect "yığın", which in that case is the IEnumerable, it özgü some interesting members: "inner", "outer", "inn
technically C# does hamiş allow functions to be outside of a class, however you could debate that static methods of a static class are functions and not methods. This is a good explanation here: stackoverflow.com/a/155655/2146952GitHub'da bizimle ortaklaşa iş kuruluşn Bu derunğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada hassaten problemlerı ve
Is this professor being unnecessarily harsh or did I actually make a mistake? more hot questionsKatı çok programlama dili ile teknolojisine geniş perspektiften yaklaşarak, yeni mebdelayanlardan profesyonellere derece her seviyeden bireye şayeste muhtevaeriklerle donatılmıştır.Another scenario where it may be useful to have an alternative m